The Penal Trap of Incorrect Social Policy
The article contains a discussion of the views of trying to explain today recorded an alarming increase in the number of people deposited in prisons. View, these ideas show how flawed and shortsighted social policies pursued in many Western countries, instead of focusing on long-term, arduous it is true, but more effective activation programs of social assimilation of representatives of disadvantaged economically, focuses on ad hoc, mostly populist surgery. At the end of shows recently announced the views P.K. Enns of the inherent relationships incarceration rates with the shaped by media moods of the American public. At the end of shows recently announced the views P.K. Enns of the inherent relationships incarceration rates with the shaped by media moods of the American public.
penal policy; rehabilitation; penitentiary; exclusion; social policy; the philosophy of punishment
Bell E., 2015, The Prison Paradox in Neoliberal Britain, [w:]: Why Prison?, (red.) Scott D., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
De Gorgi A. 2014, Punishment and Society, Sage, London.
Enns P.K., 2016, Incarceration Nation. How the Unites States Became the Most Punitive Democracy in the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Feeley M.M., Simon J., 1992, The New Penology. Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Correction and its Implications, „Criminology” 1992, Vol. 30(2), s. 449–474.
Foulcault M., 2009, Alternative to Prison: Dissemination or Decline of Social Control, „Theory, Culture and Society”, Vol. 26(6), s. 12–24.
Harcourt B., 2001, Illusion of Order. The False Promise of Broken Windows Policing, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Harcourt B., 2007, Against Prediction. Profiling, Policing and Punishing in Actuarial Age, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Harcourt B., 2007, Post-modern Meditation on Punishment, „Social Research”, Vol. 74(2), s. 307–383.
Hornquist M., 2014, Repositioning Sovereignty, „Theoretical Criminology”, Vol 18, s. 528–545.
Hornquist M., 2015, Pleasure Punishment and the Professional Middle Class, [w:] Why Prison?, (red.) Scott D., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jedlewski S., 1966, Analiza pedagogiczna systemu dyscyplinarno-izolacyjnego w resocjalizacji nieletnich, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław.
Meiners E., 2014, Trouble with the Child in the Carceral, „State Journal of Crime Conflict and World Order”, Vol. 39, s. 2–21.
Scott D. (red.), 2015, Unequalled in Pain, [w:] Why Prison?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wacquant L., 2015, Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prison Fare and Social Insecurity, [w:] Why prison?, (red.) Scott D., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Welch M., 1999, Punishment in America, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Welch M., 2003, Ironies of Social Control and The Criminalization of Immigrants „Criminal Law and Social Change”, Vol. 73, s. 17–28.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in accordance with conditions identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also called as CC-BY) license conditions, available on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ and this permission applies to any language version or any later version of the license as published by the Creative Commons organization.
Author retain the copyright to the article, while at the same time he/she transfers the article property rights to the Publisher free of charge (without territorial and time restrictions).
The online edition of the Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation is published under Open Access, which means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of these articles - are provided with full unrestricted access.
The publisher does not charge for providing access to full versions of articles nor for their use as referred to in above.