End of „Mass Imprisonmet” Policy in the USA? (Un)profitability Widespread Use of Inprisonment
Abstract
Since the 1970s, the number of prisoners in the US has been increasing., but this is not due to an increase in crime as statistics during this time actually indicate a decline. America is living with the illusion that imprisonment is the cure for crime. The majority of funds from the budget, rather than being spent on education, welfare and health, goes to gigantic expansions of prisons. Legislation under which an increasing number of criminals is sentenced to longer terms of imprisonment for an even broader range of offenses has changed. Support for such a number of new prisoners consumes more and more costs, both financial and social. This realization came quite late, because only in 2011, when the financial system of California, a state which expanded its prison system the most of all the US states, broke down. Since then, the prison population of the United States has begun to decrease slightly.Keywords
mass imprisonment; punitive criminal policy; cost of imprisonment
References
Blumstein A., Kadane J.B., 1983, An Approach to the Allocation of Scarce Imprisonment Resources, „Crime and Delinquency”, no. 29 (4).
Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1983, Setting Prison Terms. BJS Bulletin (NCJ-76218), Washington, DC.
Chapman W., 1985, Commitments to Prison with Long Minimum Terms, Department of Correctional Services, Albany, NY.
Clark S., 1984, Determinate Sentencing Laws: North Carolina, Paper presented at the National Conference on Sentencing, Baltimore, MD.
Cole G.F., Smith C., 2008, Criminal Justice in America, [fifth edition], Thomson, Wadsworth.
Cooper C.S., Kelley D., Larson S., 1982, Judicial and Executive Discretion in the Sentencing Process: Analysis of States Felony Code Provisions (Law Enforcement Assistance Administration contract No. J-LEAA-011-78), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
Flanagan T.J., 1995, Long-Term Incarceration. Issues of Science, Policy and Correctional Practice, [in:] Long-Term Imprisonment. Policy, Science, and Correctional Practice, (eds.) T.J. Flanagan, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, London-New Delhi.
Gold S.D., 1991, The Story Behind State Spending Trends, „Rockefeller Institute Bulletin”, no. 4–6, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Goodstein L., Kramer J.H., Nuss L., 1984, Defining Determinacy: Components of the Sentencing Process Ensuring Equity and Release Certainty, „Justice Quarterly”, April.
Hagan J., Dinovitzer R., 1999, Collateral Consequences of Imprisonment for Children, Communities, and Prisoners, „Crime and Justice: A Review of Research”, no. 26.
Irwin J., Austin J., 2001, It’s About Time: America’s Imprisonment Binge, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Krajewski K., 2007, Czy więzienie jest skuteczne? Uwagi na marginesie amerykańskiej dyskusji na temat wpływu kary pozbawienia wolności na rozmiary przestępczości, [in:] Nauki penalne wobec problemów współczesnej przestępczości. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 70. rocznicy urodzin Profesora Andrzeja Gaberle, Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warsaw.
Lasocik Z., 2006, Kara dożywotniego pozbawienia wolności w Wielkiej Brytanii i Stanach Zjednoczonych – wybrane problemy, [in:] Kary długoterminowe, Oficyna Wydawnicza Wyższej Szkoły Handlu i Prawa im. Ryszarda Łazarskiego, Warsaw.
Lubowski A., 2009, Mgła nad Golden State. Co doprowadziło Kalifornię na krawędź bankructwa, „Polityka”, July, 5.
MacKenzie D., 2001, Sentencing and Corrections in the 21st Century: Setting the Stage for the Future, report of Evaluation Research Group, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice University of Maryland.
MacKenzie D., Goodstein L., 1995, Long-Term Incarceration Impacts and Characteristics of Long-Term Offenders, [in:] Long-Term Imprisonment. Policy, Science, and Correctional Practice, (eds.) Flanagan T.J., SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks-London–New Delhi.
Martinson R., 1974, What Works? Questions and Answers About Prison Reform, „Public Interest”, Vol. 35.
Medina J., 2013, California’s Continuing Prison Crisis, „The New York Times”, August, 10.
Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary: Training Materials, 1980, Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission.
Moore S., 2009, California Prisons Must Cut Inmate Population, „The New York Times”, August, 4.
Nellis A., 2013, Life Goes On: The Historic Rise in Life Sentences in America, The Sentencing Project, Washington.
Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, 1982, Sentencing Guidelines Manual, Author, State College.
Pilkington E., 2013, Over 3,000 US Prisoners Serving Life Without Parole for Nonviolent Crimes, „The Guardian”, 13 of November.
Ruddell R., 2004, America Behind Bars. Trends in Imprisonment, 1950 to 2000, LFB Scholary Publishing LLC, New York.
Sabol W.J., 1999, Time Served in Prison by Federal Offenders, 1986–97, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report.
Samuels A., 2010, Can a New Prison Save a Town?, „Los Angeles Times”, May 03.
Schiraldi V., 1998, Is Maryland’s System of Higher Education Suffering Because of Prison Expenditures?, Justice Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
Shane-Dubow S., 1984, Sentencing Reform in the United States: History, Content, and Effect, Paper presented at the National Conference on Sentencing, Baltimore, MD.
Staples B., 2012, California Horror Stories and the 3-Strikes Law, „New York Times”, 25 of November.
Subramanian R., Shames A., 2013, Sentencing and Prison Practices in Germany and the Netherlands: Implications for the United States, Vera Institute of Justice, New York.
U.S. Department of Justice, 1981, Prison Population Still Rising, Justice Assistance News.
Węglarczyk B., 2011, Kalifornia w pułapce surowego prawa, „Gazeta Wyborcza”, 24 maja.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, http://www.bjs.gov/ [access: 24.10.2015].
The Maria Grzegorzewska University Poland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice:
Articles are published in accordance with conditions identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also called as CC-BY) license conditions, available on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ and this permission applies to any language version or any later version of the license as published by the Creative Commons organization.
Author retain the copyright to the article, while at the same time he/she transfers the article property rights to the Publisher free of charge (without territorial and time restrictions).
The online edition of the Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation is published under Open Access, which means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of these articles - are provided with full unrestricted access.
The publisher does not charge for providing access to full versions of articles nor for their use as referred to in above.
