Selected factors relevant to the decision-making process during the performance of diagnostic activities by the probation officer


The article presents selected aspects of knowledge that are important for taking diagnostic activities by a probation officer. I pay special attention to factors that play an important role in the decision making process of the probation officer during diagnostic activities. I would also like to draw attention to the importance of the probation officer’s understanding of the client’s behavior and the need to take into account the context of the occurring symptoms of social maladjustment, as this is the basis for preparing appropriate plans to stop a juveniles from committing antisocial acts (Hejne 1982). The purpose of this article is also to illustrate the variety and diversity of knowledge that family court probation officers should possess in order for the diagnosis to be objective. The probation officer’s knowledge comes from both personal and professional sources. What influences the manifested style of the probation officer’s work are his previous life experiences, as well as what he or she learned at work, i.e. practical, empirical and theoretical knowledge, professional ethics as well as established work standards. It is impossible to discuss in one article all the factors determining the functioning of clients of probation officers, therefore only selected aspects of knowledge that are relevant for taking diagnostic activities by a probation officers will be presented in the article.

[1]Goldstein W., Hogarth R., 1997, Judgement and decision research: Some historical context, [w]: Research on judgement and decision making: currents, connections and [2]controversies, (red.) W. Goldstein, R. Hogarth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[3]Fengler J., 2001, Pomaganie męczy – wypalenie w pracy zawodowej, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
[4]Hejne M., 1982, Warunki efektywności resocjalizacji nieletnich poddanych dozorowi sądowych kuratorów społecznych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
[5]Munro E., 2008, Effective child protection, Sage, London.
[6]Opora R., 2006, Rola sędziów i kuratorów sądowych w resocjalizacji nieletnich, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk.
[7]Opora R., 2013, Znaczenie umiejętności prowadzenia rozmowy przez wychowawcę w pracy resocjalizacyjnej, [w:] Funkcjonowanie kadry penitencjarnej w procesie wykonywania kary pozbawienia wolności. Studia i Rozprawy z Pedagogiki Resocjalizacyjnej, t. 4, (red.) D. Kowalczyk, I. Mudrecka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole, s. 69–81.
[8]Paszkiewicz A., 1999, Podmiotowe traktowanie wychowanka w pracy rodzinnego kuratora sądowego, Norbertinum, Lublin.
[9]Stasiak K., Jedynak A., 2010, Zarys metodyki pracy kuratora sądowego, LexisNexis, Warszawa.
[10]Wysocka E., 2008, Diagnoza w resocjalizacji, PWN.

Published : 2020-03-07

Opora, R. (2020). Selected factors relevant to the decision-making process during the performance of diagnostic activities by the probation officer. Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation, (17), 81–90.

Robert Opora
Uniwersytet Gdański  Poland

CitedBy Crossref

CitedBy Scopus

Copyright Notice:

Articles are published in accordance with conditions identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also called as CC-BY) license conditions, available on and this permission applies to any language version or any later version of the license as published by the Creative Commons organization.

Author retain the copyright to the article, while at the same time he/she transfers the article property rights to the Publisher free of charge (without territorial and time restrictions).

The online edition of the Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation is published under Open Access, which means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of these articles - are provided with full unrestricted access.

The publisher does not charge for providing access to full versions of articles nor for their use as referred to in above.