Differentiable Attitudes Towards Specific Crimes and Contexts: A Quantification of Neutralization Techniques


Abstract

The neutralization theory of Sykes and Matza (1957) posits that delinquent individuals attempt to continually reintegrate with society by mentally asserting that their deviant behavior is actually normative, via an excuse. Sykes and Matza gave five excuses, or techniques of neutralization: denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of the victim, condemnation of condemners, and appeal to higher loyalties. Sykes and Matza were primarily concerned with the general concept of neutralization, rather than trying to understand the specific utilities of the different technique categories they labeled. The goal of this work is to determine which techniques may be most common, and under what circumstances (what crimes or deviant behaviors) neutralizations may be most effective. Using a factorial vignette survey design with a multinational sample of college students from Poland and the United States, we find neutralization utility varies by technique and circumstance, and the denial of responsibility technique is especially potent.


Keywords

neutralizacja; usprawiedliwienie; porównawcze; międzynarodowe; przestępstwo

Akers R.L., 1985, Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, (3 ed.), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

Bandura A., 1999, Disengagement in the Perpetuation of Inhumanities, „Personality and Social Psychology Review”, no. 3 (3).

Benson M.L., 1985, Denying the Guilty Mind: Accounting for Involvement in White-Collar Crime, „Criminology”, nr 23.

Blalock H.M., 1964, Casual Inferences in Nonexperimental Research, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.

Braithwaite J., 1989, Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Clarke R.G. i Cornish D.B, 1985, Modelling Offenders’ Decisions: A Framework for Research and Policy, (eds.) M. Tonry i N. Morris, „Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research”, nr 6, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Cohen A.K., 1955, Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.

Coleman J.W., 2002, The Criminal Elite: The Sociology of White-Collar Crime, (5 ed.), St. Martin’s, New York.

Cromwell P., Thurman Q., 2003, The Devil Made me do it: Use of Neutralizations by Shoplifters, „Deviant Behavior”, no. 24.

Ferraro K.J., Johnson J.M., 1983, How Women Experience Battering: The Process of Victimization, „Social Problems”, no. 30.

Gruber V., Schlegelmilch B.B., 2014, How Techniques of Neutralization Legitimize Norm- and Attitude-Inconsistent Consumer Behavior, „Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 121(1).

Higginson J.G., 1999, Defining, Excusing, and Justifying Deviance: Teen Mothers’ Accounts of Statutory Rape, „Symbolic Interaction”, no. 22.

Hirschi T., 1969, Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Klockars C.B., 1974, The Professional Fence, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Li J., Wu J., 2012, Validating an indigenous scale measuring neutralization techniques among Chinese juvenile thieves, “Psychological Reports”, no. 111(3).

Matza D., 1964, Delinquency and Drift, John Wiley, New York.

Matza D., 1999, Delinquency and Drift, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.

Pitt R.N., 2010, Killing the Messenger: Religious Black Gay Men’s Neutralization of Anti-Gay Religious Messages, „Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion”, no. 49 (1).

Scully D., Marolla J., 1984, Convicted Rapists’ Vocabulary of Motive: Excuses and Justifications, „Social Problems”, no 31(5).

Sutherland E., 1947, Principles of Criminology, Lippincott, Philadelphia.

Sykes G., Matza D., 1957, Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency, „American Sociological Review”, no. 22(6).

Vieraitis L.M., Piquero N.L., Piquero A.R., Tibbetts S.G., Blankenship M., 2012, Do Women and Men Differ in Their Neutralizations of Corporate Crime?, „Criminal Justice Review”, no. 37(4).

Published : 2016-12-13


Zuber, M., Greenberg, E., & Williams, L. (2016). Differentiable Attitudes Towards Specific Crimes and Contexts: A Quantification of Neutralization Techniques. Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation, (11), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.22432/pjsr.2016.11.12

Małgorzata J. Zuber 
University of Massachusetts Lowell  United States
Edward W. Greenberg 
Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts  United States
Linda M. Williams 


CitedBy Crossref
0

CitedBy Scopus
0



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice:

Articles are published in accordance with conditions identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also called as CC-BY) license conditions, available on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ and this permission applies to any language version or any later version of the license as published by the Creative Commons organization.

Author retain the copyright to the article, while at the same time he/she transfers the article property rights to the Publisher free of charge (without territorial and time restrictions).

The online edition of the Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation is published under Open Access, which means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of these articles - are provided with full unrestricted access.

The publisher does not charge for providing access to full versions of articles nor for their use as referred to in above.